Skip to Main Content
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

Windows 7: Officially Dead This Week

It was nothing more than a patch to a perfectly good version of the operating system; may Windows 7 rot in its grave.

October 29, 2014
Windows 7 logo

With no funeral, retrospectives, accolades, or notes of sadness, the Windows 7 era has come to an end.

As noted by Network World, Microsoft will stop selling Windows 7 licenses to PC makers this Friday. So no more new PCs with Windows 7, with the exception of existing inventory. Windows 7 Professional will remain on sale as a standalone product for a very limited time.

What does this mean for the vast number of Windows users? Apparently, not much. New machines are equipped with Windows 8 and Windows 10 is just around the corner. We can now see Windows 7 for what it was: a placeholder designed to assuage the hordes of critics who did not like Vista.

In my office, I have three machines. A Vista machine (which I'm writing on), a Windows 7 machine mostly used for podcasting, and a Windows 8.1 machine being primed to replace the reliable Vista machine. There is also a Windows 8.1 laptop. Of all the machines, the Windows 7 machine, insofar as the OS is concerned, is the least impressive.

Opinions Windows 7 refuses to talk to the other machines on the network. It won't talk to one of the Epson printers and new drivers cannot make it work. It turns its nose up at the old Network Attached Storage (NAS) device I use. There were some patches that allowed it to see the NAS for a while, then it crapped out and the connection never worked again.

Windows 7 showed up in the market to "save" Microsoft after the company failed to market the feature-heavy Vista properly and the public soured on it. After all these years, I can accurately conclude that Vista was head and shoulders above Windows 7.

Windows 7 was a defensive OS designed to pare down Vista and clean it up to make it more presentable. In the process, it felt more like XP than Vista.

The things it could not do were too numerous, but because the hatred of Vista was so extreme nobody wanted to whine about Windows 7 lest they look like complainers. If you have not noticed, there has been a trend towards passivity amongst the tech media. They've given up. Complaining does not really work. Fixes make things worse. Windows 7 was the best example of this.

Thus we have no retrospectives for Windows 7, nothing. It's kind of the way it was with a lot of other Microsoft dogs. Bob, the graphical cartoon-like OS, is not even allowed in the official Microsoft timeline. Who knows when it was discontinued? Front Page, a world-beater of a Web development platform (largely ruined by Microsoft) ended with no fanfare. There are plenty of examples, but they generally are not key operating systems. Even Windows ME never seemed like anything serious and it definitely wasn't released to fix anything.

Windows 10 appears to be a little like an OS designed to fix Windows 8.1, an OS which did get a lot of complaints (perhaps grudgingly). Most of the complainers, like myself, found workarounds that made the OS fine. In my case it was Classic Shell.

I use Classic Shell because there are certain characteristics of Windows that are commonplace—that make it Windows. When I first saw Vista I knew there would be problems because someone did more than gussy up the look of the product and add powerful behind-the-scenes features. They messed up the user interface. The first time I was on a Vista machine hooked to a Wi-Fi network it took me forever to figure out how to find the network and then change it. This was not difficult with XP; it was simple. Why make it difficult? Why change the process? Why change anything that has to do with program control? Was it just for the sake of change?

This sort of change for change's sake re-appeared with Windows 8. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me the rationale for full-screen applications. If you want to grow the page to full screen that was always possible. Most often you did not want that. You want to move Windows around. So why make an application full-screen only? What is the point? It's retro (hello DOS!). It's inconvenient. It's ugly. It's incredibly stupid looking on a 27-inch (or larger) monitor. Who exactly at Microsoft thought this was a good idea? Who approved this good idea? And who signed off on it?

We will never get an answer to these questions.

It was this sort of arrogance that previously brought down Vista. Let's change things for no good reason. The end result was a fix called Windows 7, a worse program. Time to start the process over again.

Goodbye, Windows 7, and good riddance.

Get Our Best Stories!

Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.


Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters

TRENDING

About John C. Dvorak

Columnist, PCMag.com

John C. Dvorak is a columnist for PCMag.com and the co-host of the twice weekly podcast, the No Agenda Show. His work is licensed around the world. Previously a columnist for Forbes, PC/Computing, Computer Shopper, MacUser, Barrons, the DEC Professional as well as other newspapers and magazines. Former editor and consulting editor for InfoWorld, he also appeared in the New York Times, LA Times, Philadelphia Enquirer, SF Examiner, and the Vancouver Sun. He was on the start-up team for C/Net as well as ZDTV. At ZDTV (and TechTV) he hosted Silicon Spin for four years doing 1000 live and live-to-tape TV shows. His Internet show Cranky Geeks was considered a classic. John was on public radio for 8 years and has written over 5000 articles and columns as well as authoring or co-authoring 14 books. He's the 2004 Award winner of the American Business Editors Association's national gold award for best online column of 2003. That was followed up by an unprecedented second national gold award from the ABEA in 2005, again for the best online column (for 2004). He also won the Silver National Award for best magazine column in 2006 as well as other awards. Follow him on Twitter @therealdvorak.

Read John C.'s full bio

Read the latest from John C. Dvorak