APPLE has landed a crucial blow on its main rival Samsung in a two-year feud over alleged patent infringement by winning a key ruling in the top US trade court.
Samsung violated two of Apple's iPhone patents and must end the US import of some of its products, the International Trade Commission (ITC) ruled on Friday.
However, the ruling does not mean an instant ban on importing Samsung devices into the US.
A 60-day presidential review will take place, during which time the South Korean company will have the chance to implement a series of workarounds. A veto on the decision by President Barack Obama is not thought likely.
The ITC found Samsung had unfairly used Apple technology in some of its devices. It issued cease and desist orders banning further imports of some Samsung products, but dismissed four other claims made by Apple.
The verdict came as Apple asked an appeal court to force Samsung to stop using iPhone features that a jury had declared to be in violation of its patents. Apple is seeking to overturn a court order allowing Samsung to keep selling products that use the disputed patents.
Last year, a California jury found against the South Korean company and awarded Apple more than $1 billion (£645m) in compensation. The jury ruled 26 of Samsung's products violated six Apple patents.
The dispute comes at a difficult time for Apple, which is losing market share to smartphones using Google's Android operating system, many of which are made by Samsung. According to the International Data Corportation, Apple's share in the worldwide smartphone operating system market fell in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter last year.
In Washington on Friday, a federal appeals judge heard testimony in a separate patent case between the companies relating to a decision last year, in which Samsung was found to owe Apple $1bn for infringing patents. That penalty was later struck to $450m (£290m), and Apple appealed. A verdict has not yet been issued.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article